
More progress shots. Err, well, actually, they’re from the same batch as yesterday. I worked the hands again and are two days beyond my estimates on that. Denial. Tomorrow, I have a vacation day so with any luck, I can put in a 12 hour day and get some things squared away. When I walk out of the shop tomorrow, the hands may be glued in place, or at least, glue-fit and not glued in so I can still work behind them. Ready to glue, how about that?
Remember that I’m not crazy about all of the folds and I will be working on the ones that annoy me. That’s one of the processes you have to go through. Get the white on and then look at it…a lot. Photos too. The bad stuff then jumps out at you in a few days. Take your sharpie, draw your lines and fire up the chainsaw.
It’s nice for me to see the head because mostly, he looks like the photo below–bag on head. Too much dust and although I am NOT done painting the kopf, I don’t want it dusty either. Dust clogs the woodburned lines in places like the hair or skin lines.

Another nice close up of the head–there aren’t many. It’s difficult to photograph. The eyes need work, don’t forget. I made the hat ride up high so that you can see his face. The bill is actually a bit more modern than the old time hats, which, if you study photos, can be downright short. I have found from doing shows and installations that SOMEtimes, if you try too hard to be historically accurate, you will annoy the generic onlooker. Remember, if you are the only one who knows it’s accurate and regular folks just don’t think it looks right, you will hear all sorts of rude from them. They’ll look you in the eye and tell you they know better. “…But I went to the library in the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, NY, to do research on this~”, you’ll say, but it won’t matter. And don’t get me wrong, most people are just happy as heck to see it and take a snap| with it or ask you, “…how long did it take you? how much does it weigh? Is the uniform wood?”. But I have found that every 100 or even 300 people contains that one, negative, know-it-all who just HAS to point out something that they think is not right, or SHOW you that they are cognoscenti.
Take the numbers on the backs of the jerseys. I view Babe Ruth as a once in every 500 years type of athlete. I think that he was so much better than his peers that it has never been matched since we’ve been paying attention. Muhamed Ali? Don’t make me laugh. A good fighter, but really, the fight game is mostly a smokeshow–just a step above wrestling. Ali’s real gift to mankind was trash-talking and I wish he’d take it back. Guys like DiMaggio and even Cobb were great, no doubt, but they weren’t better than everyone else in the ridiculous proportion that this man was. Go ahead, give me your “guys” that are up there with Jidge: Jordan, Tiger, Mays, Montana, Rice…all good but not in the proportion.
So the point is that I revere Ruth and I know the legend is that he was fat and you will see photos of him as a big fat guy but for every photo of him (and I have looked at thousands) as a fat man, there were 2 others of him as a svelt athlete. He spent many years at respectable weights and that is how I chose to depict him; a little more in shape than some will want to see. So I expect to hear that he was fatter, and that was true. But he was also skinnier for many seasons as well. The skinny seasons tend to be pre 1930 or so. Trouble is, if I don’t put that number 3 on the back, some will howl. But the Yankees didn’t number the uniforms until 1929, when most of your really fat Ruth photos were taken. So for the purist, I have depicted a fairly in-shape Ruth, post-1929, or at least equal. Will anyone care? Naah, except for the occasional comment that, “…he was fatter”, most don’t know that numbers were an innovation in 1929 and they EXPECT to see that number and they will insist that it is wrong if it isn’t there. Give the people what they want.
