

With perhaps days/hours to go before the baby, I’m doing a big push on Jackie Robinson to see how far I can get before my life changes so much. I had a big day in the shop yesterday and took these stereo photos.
Together, they can be viewed in 3-D. If you were one of those who could left your eyes relax and see those old 3-D, computer-generated drawings, then you SHOULD be able to do this the same way. I can do it. But it takes a few moments to get it.
The trick, for me, is to get far enough away from the two photos, so that they are a little smaller than a postcard, held at arms length. Then you stare, allowing your eyes to relax and not truly focus. When your eyes are relaxed correctly, you should see double–that’s 4 images. Keep trying different pressures on your focus until the two center photos become 1 photo and it will be 3-D. It’s eerie. When you get it, you will KNOW, so if you are wondering, then you don’t have it. Remember: Try and make the middle two images merge into one, so that overall, there are 3 photos, and only concentrate on that middle photo–that’s the one that will become 3-dimensional.
How did I take this photo? With a 3-D camera? Nahh, with my own camera. Since I’m working with a tripod, and nothing is in motion, the time lapse between photo1 and photo2 can be ignored. You couldn’t do this trick with live action, because p1 and p2 would not match. But in the studio, you just take one photo and then move the tripod 80mm to the right and take another one. 80mm is about the distance between people’s eyes. The “interpupillary distance”. Actually, in the population, it’s much smaller for most and is smaller for women and bigger for some ethnic groups. It runs between 65 and 83 mm. At 25.4 mm per inch, you do the inch-math.
With the two photos of EXATLY the same thing and yet from two slight different (80mm apart) vantage points, they are about what your brain takes in and processes into one, 3-D image. The slightly different perspective means that the right eye sees a little further around Jackie’s left side, than the left eye can see. That info is used by your wonderful brain to give you all sorts of depth and distance information. Imagine trying to golf without it! “How far to the pin?” “Where’s the 150 yd marker?”
And for you Liberals out there, remember, the beauty of the eye and the brain and the depth is pure chance–we’re talking NO INTELLIGENT DESIGN, right? Don’t even think those words in a public school.
Before you go thinking I’m some kind of techy person, realize that 3-D cameras and looking at “stereo-images” like we are here, originated at about the time of the Civil War. Stereo view photos were all the rage from about 1870 to 1910. They looked like this:
They were viewed in a viewer that looked like this:
The slides were available as canned, commercially produced photos of current events and famous places and landmarks. Think GAF-viewmaster from the 1970’s:

I’m not sure why they fell out of favor. Perhaps WWI, which destroyed so much of what good was happening in the world around 1914.
Anyway, they did commercially produce stereo cameras for the home-gamer and here is one:
All you need is the ability to take TWO images simultaneously, one interpupillary distance apart. Now if you search for these things, you will only find, I believe, film cameras from yesteryear. There doesn’t seem to be any digital stereo cameras available. There are a couple of guys who have hacked together two digital cameras, but the hack is never simple and the mounting and alignment is never easy. Both lenses have to point at the same focal point out in space, or the pictures will look hokey–like mine!
What I want to know is why doesn’t SOMEone produce a decent digital stereo camera? WHY? With PC’s bringing down photography prices and giving us all sorts of exotic ways to display them, it’s a perfect marriage! I have searched, but not recently, so it’s possible that there is something out there now. If anyone knows of a product, comment in please.
For Jackie fans, Jackie may be getting his first paint today on the lower legs and shoes and pants. It’s always the single biggest, quickest change in the statue and for a medium that goes crawling by in the hundreds of hours, this is a welcome thing.
















