Great stuff from someone I know at a bigtime polling/survey company (figures, right?).
Thanks and for more Click Here
This table is the result of all the quarters played in Superbowl history:
This table is the result of all the quarters played in the 2006-07 season:
For the first quarter the following numbers in the last 40 Superbowls have been: 0,3,4,6,7. That’s it. If you have those numbers, for any team, you are looking good, at least for the first quarter prize.
0 has shown up 37 times (20 times for the away team, and 17 times for the home).
3 was 19 times.
4 was 5 times.
6 was 1 time.
7 was 18 times.
Best first quarter combo? 0,0, which showed up 9 times.
For the second quarter the following numbers in the last 40 Superbowls have been: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Everyone can be a winner! Those holding 0, once again, are looking good.
0 has shown up 25 times
1 was 2 times.
2 was 2 times.
3 was 16 times.
4 was 8 times.
5 was 1 time.
6 was 7 times.
7 was 14 times.
8 was 3 times.
9 was 2 times.
Best second quarter combo? 7,0 which was 5 times. Plenty of other combos showed up 4 times.
Once again, for the third quarter the following numbers in the last 40 Superbowls have been: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
0 was 16 times.
1 was 4 times.
2 was 2 times.
3 was 10 times.
4 was 12 times.
5 was 4 times.
6 was 8 times.
7 was 17 times.
8 was 2 times.
9 was 5 times.
Best third quarter combo? There isn’t a clearcut favorite. 0 and 4 show up 4 times.
The final score everyone shows up again.
0 was 12 times.
1 was 9 times.
2 was 4 times.
3 was 6 times.
4 was 10 times.
5 was 4 time.
6 was 10 times.
7 was 15 times.
8 was 3 times.
9 was 7 times.
Best final score combo? 7&4 showed up 4 times. 7&0 was 3 times.
The best number, clearly, was 0. It appeared 90 times: in every quarter & final for the last 40 Superbowls.
7 showed up 64 times, or 20% of the time. The worst number was 8, which appeared only 8 times. This was also the same story for 5, which hit 9 times.
–fog


Great stuff from someone I know at a bigtime polling/survey company (figures, right?). Thanks and for more Click Here
For the first quarter the following numbers in the last 40 Superbowls have been: 0,3,4,6,7. That’s it. If you have those numbers, for any team, you are looking good, at least for the first quarter prize.
0 has shown up 37 times (20 times for the away team, and 17 times for the home).
3 was 19 times.
4 was 5 times.
6 was 1 time.
7 was 18 times.
Best first quarter combo? 0,0, which showed up 9 times.
For the second quarter the following numbers in the last 40 Superbowls have been: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Everyone can be a winner! Those holding 0, once again, are looking good.
0 has shown up 25 times
1 was 2 times.
2 was 2 times.
3 was 16 times.
4 was 8 times.
5 was 1 time.
6 was 7 times.
7 was 14 times.
8 was 3 times.
9 was 2 times.
Best second quarter combo? 7,0 which was 5 times. Plenty of other combos showed up 4 times.
Once again, for the third quarter the following numbers in the last 40 Superbowls have been: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
0 was 16 times.
1 was 4 times.
2 was 2 times.
3 was 10 times.
4 was 12 times.
5 was 4 times.
6 was 8 times.
7 was 17 times.
8 was 2 times.
9 was 5 times.
Best third quarter combo? There isn’t a clearcut favorite. 0 and 4 show up 4 times.
The final score everyone shows up again.
0 was 12 times.
1 was 9 times.
2 was 4 times.
3 was 6 times.
4 was 10 times.
5 was 4 time.
6 was 10 times.
7 was 15 times.
8 was 3 times.
9 was 7 times.
Best final score combo? 7&4 showed up 4 times. 7&0 was 3 times.
The best number, clearly, was 0. It appeared 90 times: in every quarter & final for the last 40 Superbowls.
7 showed up 64 times, or 20% of the time. The worst number was 8, which appeared only 8 times. This was also the same story for 5, which hit 9 times.
–fog
Comment by mcgonnigle — February 1, 2007 @ 9:24 pm |
Too long; didn’t read.
Comment by Maria — January 29, 2009 @ 10:02 am |
Great data – thanks for sharing this.
Maria – if you didn’t have ADD, and weren’t a snot, you would take the time to not only read, but actually comprehend the data here.
Comment by John C — January 29, 2009 @ 10:59 am |